Rufus Sewell Interview
British actor Rufus Sewell stars as a distraught father looking for his son, lost after the 2005 tsunami, in Vinyan, directed by Fabrice du Welz. Here he speaks with View Londonís Matthew Turner about his chemistry with his co-star, Emmanuelle Beart, how 'Vinyan' is a very difficult film to describe and his big, butch beard
ViewLondon, October 2009
I thought 'Vinyan' was extremely disturbing, and unlike anything Iíve seen for quite some time. I can't think of anything that's comparable to how disturbing it is, although obviously it's thematically similar to films like 'Don't Look Now', with a couple losing a child and then descending into madness.
Rufus Sewell (RS): Absolutely, in a way there is an homage in there, itís not accidental. I asked Fabrice (director Fabrice Du Welz) because that is a favourite film of mine. When I read the script it reminded me of so many different things that shouldnít go together. It reminded me a little of 'Jacob's Ladder'; Iím talking about films I really love Ė movies that fuck with your head. One of the frustrating things for me, which I knew, was they would have trouble marketing 'Vinyan'. One of the reasons certain people react against this film is due to the marketing. In some areas they tried to market it as pure unadulterated horror Ė itís not! I wouldnít even call it a horror film.
When I read the script, that's not what I read - I read a very painfully truthful psychological thriller that I found very moving. Put that along the side the fact that Fabrice believes he is making a ghost movie at the same time; which I think that contrast is extraordinary, in that it's a genre shifting film. To start off with, the film has a sort of John Cassavetes style to it. Very rough and hand held camera - close up, psychological drama. Which proceeds to get weirder, and weirder; and that is a very difficult thing to sell. Itís a very difficult film to even describe, in a way that doesnít confuse people.
What was it like, working with Emmanuelle Beart?
RS: Working with Emmanuelle was very easy, she is a very easy person to connect with. We just immediately felt like a couple. We were very relaxed and trusting of each other. I loved working with her. It was one of the easiest, automatic relationships Iíve ever had on screen. To use an American expression, we had each other's back; which is something that I never had to worry about, because it was just there.
Your character is obviously in a very dark place, psychologically. How do you prepare for something like that?
RS: Well I donít know if itís about preparation really. Being a father, when I read it just hit me with a wallop. I didnít need to sit and Ė you know, I had a natural reaction to the material. In terms of preparation, no itís just the matter of being in the situation and letting it affect and infect you. I tried to just be as open and honest with each situation. The situation itself was so affecting, and oppressive you just had to struggle through it. I never had to search for it, it was there waiting for me. Itís such a powerful and horrible idea; there was no reason to be ghoulish during the preparation. It just happened that I had a natural and visceral reaction to it.
Since you shot it chronologically, the last scene in the film being pretty horrendous, how did Emmanuelle prepare for that, and were you around for the filming?
RS: Yes, I was around. A lot of the film had a very tight script, but a lot of things were forced because of the elements. The script really came together as we were doing it, if a scene didnít turn out to be practical or if we had other ideas Ė like, there was massive rainstorm that we incorporated into the film Ė the incredible scene of us on the jetty, that was real rain. It just started raining, and Fabrice thought, ďFuck it, let's use this.Ē He had an idea for a scene right then, which wound up being filmed.
It was wonderful because he was so open to whatever the elements threw at us, because that is what the film is about. At the end I think they ended up with a crane shot they decided didn't work, and then it started raining and the children started going this way and this thing just happened and it was very much something they directed but it was spontaneous. I wasnít there, but I remember talking to them all about it afterwards, and how excited they were.
Had you seen 'Calvaire' (Fabrice's previous film)?
RS: Yes, I had. When I read the script I knew I already wanted to do it. Then I saw 'Calvaire', and it was doubly exciting. For a start, in this country, itís a role I often don't become aware of until Iím in Blockbuster to be honest, they donít send them to me. It is something that is changing though. The fact that this is a French film with a Belgian director, that's no coincidence, otherwise it wouldn't have come to me. I thought to myself, thank God, finally a normal guy in extraordinary circumstances, not some twat on a horse.
I was very excited about that, because I thought it was such a great script, and you know an English bloke who has that kind of cultural frustration and blocked anger which he's emotionally ill-equipped as he finds himself in this terrible bind Ė and I wanted to play it and I pretty much told them that and then I saw 'Calvaire' and then I was like, Oh Jesus, this guy is nuts - in the best way! He's got this extraordinary imagination.
What are you doing next?
RS: Right now I am working on a thing in Budapest called 'Pillars of the Earth', which is being produced by Scott Free Productions (owned by Ridley and Tony Scott). I believe itís going to be four part two hour mini-series. There is money coming in from all different cultures, which means there is isnít one conglomerate making all the artistic decisions. The director, Sergio Mimica-Gezzan, who was Steven Spielbergís First AD for a very long time. The story is based on the novel by Ken Follett, and has been really well adapted. And the cast is great, it's got Donald Sutherland, Ian McShane, Eddie Redmayne, Haley Atwell and Matthew Macfadyen Ė a really good cast. I play a builder named Tom. It's why I've got this big butch beard.
You're not on a horse, then?
RS: Ha, no, not on a horse! For me, the caricature Iím not interested in playing, it's not so much about period drama, itís the specific type of one-dimensional baddie. And in fact, if I want to play another one, I fucking will, actually. It's just as long as there is a choice involved. For me, playing a working man and a father is no different from playing anything else but difficult for me to be cast in those roles. So I'm really enjoying playing somebody who can move a fridge.
You say Vinyan is a departure for you, was that part of the appeal as well?
RS: Yes, but you say departure, but for me it is more a departure from the kind of role I can get. The biggest departure Iíve ever made was to play a baddie actually, because the truth is Iím a comic actor. The biggest departure Iíve ever done is any job I ever do. The problem is I live in the real world where it is actually a question of convincing pen-pushers and secretaries to give me the opportunity to do what I do easiest. For me, it was a chance to do something I felt comfortable with, but not something people were comfortable in casting me in. That is why Iím so pleased to be playing a father now because a lot of the characters Iíve played are people you wouldnít let near your children. I donít like the word departure, because that would suggest that for me, it is; for me it's not. It's just an opportunity.